Nawaz Sharif: Pakistan’s Comeback King Poised for Another Term as Prime Minister

Pakistan’s political landscape is witnessing a familiar yet dramatic turn of events. Former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who returned from a self-imposed exile just a year ago, is now the clear front-runner to lead the country after the upcoming election scheduled for February 8th. Once again, Nawaz Sharif, the three-time former prime minister, is on the brink of reclaiming his seat at the pinnacle of Pakistan’s political arena.

This is no ordinary comeback; it’s a testament to his resilience in the face of adversity. Despite numerous setbacks in his career, including convictions and a military coup, Nawaz Sharif seems poised for yet another political revival.

A Return Few Anticipated

Nawaz Sharif’s political resurgence was unexpected by many, considering his earlier downfall. His last term in office was overshadowed by allegations of corruption, which led to his ousting in 2017. Before that, in 1999, a military coup toppled his government. Despite such high-profile setbacks, Sharif is once again emerging as the central figure in Pakistan’s political scene.

“He’s a top candidate to be the next premier, not because he’s wildly popular, but because he’s played his cards right,” explains Michael Kugelman, Director for South Asia at the Wilson Center.

Sharif’s re-entry into Pakistan’s political scene has been marked by sharp contrasts. While his main rival, former Prime Minister Imran Khan, is incarcerated and his political party suppressed, Nawaz Sharif is gathering momentum.

The King of Comebacks

Nawaz Sharif’s political career is defined by his ability to stage comebacks. The 1999 coup that removed him from power would have signaled the end of the road for most politicians. However, in 2013, Sharif returned triumphantly to win the parliamentary elections and serve a historic third term as prime minister.

The 2013 election marked the first peaceful transfer of power between two democratically elected governments in Pakistan since its independence in 1947. It was a significant moment in Pakistan’s political history, and Sharif was at the center of it.

However, Sharif’s third term was fraught with challenges. Political unrest led to a six-month blockade of Islamabad by opposition parties. His tenure ultimately ended in legal turmoil when corruption allegations surfaced, leading to his disqualification by the Supreme Court in 2017. By 2018, he was once again behind bars, convicted on charges related to his family’s ownership of steel mills in Saudi Arabia.

A Roller-Coaster Ride Through Legal Battles

The legal troubles that have followed Nawaz Sharif for years are central to his narrative. His 10-year corruption sentence in 2018 was a blow to his political career, yet he managed to get the sentence suspended just two months later. He briefly returned to politics but was jailed again that same year.

In 2019, Sharif was granted bail, citing the need for medical treatment in the UK. This allowed him to leave Pakistan, and for four years, he lived in a luxurious flat in London. Despite his absence, Sharif remained a significant force in Pakistani politics.

Sharif’s critics have consistently accused him of corruption and political maneuvering. However, his supporters argue that these charges are politically motivated, designed to stifle his influence. Regardless of the truth, Nawaz Sharif has consistently navigated Pakistan’s turbulent political landscape and emerged on top.

Early Years and Political Ascent

Born in 1949 into a prominent industrial family in Lahore, Nawaz Sharif’s political rise was closely tied to his association with Pakistan’s military. He was a protégé of military leader General Zia-ul-Haq, who ruled the country from 1977 to 1988. Sharif made his mark as an adept administrator, serving as finance and later chief minister of Punjab province in the late 1980s.

Sharif’s first term as prime minister began in 1990, but his government was dismissed in 1993. However, this did not deter him. He remained a dominant figure in Pakistani politics and returned to power in 1997 with a comfortable majority.

The 1999 Coup and Exile

Perhaps the most dramatic moment in Sharif’s career came in 1999 when he attempted to curb the power of Pakistan’s military. Tensions escalated when Sharif tried to rein in General Pervez Musharraf, the army chief at the time. This culminated in a military coup, and Sharif was arrested, jailed, and sentenced to life imprisonment. He was also convicted of corruption and banned from political activities.

However, an alleged deal brokered by Saudi Arabia allowed Sharif and his family to avoid prison and go into exile in Saudi Arabia for what was initially supposed to be a 10-year period. His time in exile would last until 2007 when he made yet another return to Pakistan.

A Comeback in 2013 and Imran Khan’s Challenge

Nawaz Sharif’s 2013 comeback was nothing short of spectacular. His Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N) party won a decisive victory in the parliamentary elections, securing his third term as prime minister. However, this time, he faced stiff competition from Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party.

The 2013 elections marked the beginning of a period of political turbulence in Pakistan. Khan’s party accused Sharif of election rigging, leading to months of protests and a blockade of Islamabad. Some analysts believe that elements within the military were working behind the scenes to destabilize Sharif’s government.

During this term, Sharif also faced growing economic challenges. While he had promised to turn Pakistan into an “Asian tiger,” his ambitious infrastructure projects were marred by allegations of corruption. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a $56 billion initiative, was one of the few bright spots during his tenure, though it, too, faced delays.

Corruption Allegations and the Panama Papers

Sharif’s downfall in 2017 came after the Panama Papers leak, which revealed that his family owned luxury apartments in London. The revelations led to a lengthy legal battle, and in 2018, Sharif was convicted in absentia and sentenced to 10 years in prison. His daughter and son-in-law were also implicated in the case.

Despite the corruption allegations and his imprisonment, Sharif has maintained his political clout. His party remains one of Pakistan’s most significant political forces.

A Clear Path to Power?

Fast forward to 2023, and Nawaz Sharif’s political fortunes have once again shifted dramatically. After years of exile in London, Sharif returned to Pakistan in October 2023, and all legal cases against him have effectively disappeared. He seems to have struck a deal with the military, the very institution that once toppled his government.

Analysts believe that Sharif’s return was facilitated by the military, which now appears more comfortable with his leadership. Michael Kugelman notes the “great irony” of Sharif’s situation: “In Pakistan, when you have the army behind you, your chances of electoral success tend to be higher.”

While Sharif is not universally popular, his narrative of stability and experience could be enough to secure him another term as prime minister. However, he still faces significant challenges, including widespread dissatisfaction with the economy and skepticism about the fairness of the upcoming election.

As Pakistan’s political future hangs in the balance, Nawaz Sharif’s return is a reminder of his remarkable staying power and ability to navigate the complex world of Pakistani politics. Whether he can once again lead the country as prime minister will soon be determined, but one thing is clear: Nawaz Sharif remains a force to be reckoned with.

Iranian Missile Supply to Russia Shifts the Ukraine Conflict Debate: Lammy

The ongoing war in Ukraine has taken yet another turn with the delivery of Iranian missiles to Russia, sparking renewed debate over whether Ukraine should be allowed to use Western-provided long-range missiles against targets within Russia. On a recent visit to Kyiv, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy told the BBC that this development has fundamentally altered the conversation surrounding Ukraine’s military tactics and the role of Western nations in the conflict.

Accompanied by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Lammy met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and other officials to discuss Ukraine’s urgent need for long-range weapons, a topic that has sparked diplomatic tensions between Ukraine and its Western allies, particularly the United States and the UK.

Ukrainian Calls for Expanded Military Support

Since the onset of Russia’s invasion in 2022, President Zelensky has repeatedly called for increased military assistance from Ukraine’s Western allies. Specifically, Ukraine has sought permission to use Western-supplied long-range missiles to target strategic locations inside Russia. However, both the US and the UK have been hesitant to grant this permission, fearing that such strikes could escalate the conflict, potentially drawing NATO countries directly into the war or provoking a more severe Russian response.

Speaking in Kyiv on Wednesday, Blinken confirmed that US President Joe Biden would likely discuss the issue with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during a meeting at the White House later in the week. However, both Blinken and Lammy avoided providing a clear answer on whether the restrictions would be lifted.

A Shifting Debate

What has brought this debate back into the spotlight is Iran’s decision to supply Russia with ballistic missiles, which will significantly boost Moscow’s ability to strike deeper into Ukrainian territory. The acquisition of these missiles by Russia is widely viewed as a game-changer, complicating the international response to the war.

Addressing the media, Blinken stated: “We’ve now seen this action of Russia acquiring ballistic missiles from Iran, which will further empower their aggression in Ukraine. So if anyone is taking escalatory action, it would appear to be Mr. Putin and Russia.” Blinken’s remarks highlight the growing concern among Western nations that Russia’s military alliance with Iran could tip the balance of the conflict in Russia’s favor, making Ukraine’s call for long-range missile capabilities even more urgent.

Lammy was careful not to provide a direct answer when asked if the US and UK would allow Ukraine to use long-range missiles inside Russia, stating only, “I am not prepared to give Putin the advantage.” His comment underscores the delicate balancing act that Western leaders face—supporting Ukraine without escalating the conflict to an uncontrollable level.

Iran’s Role in the War

Iran’s involvement in the Ukraine war, particularly its supply of ballistic missiles to Russia, has drawn significant international criticism. This transfer has not only shifted the military dynamics of the conflict but has also raised questions about Iran’s broader geopolitical intentions. Iranian officials, including Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, have denied these allegations, accusing the West of “acting on faulty intelligence and flawed logic.” Despite these denials, the evidence of Iran’s military assistance to Russia continues to mount.

For Ukraine and its Western allies, Iran’s missile supply to Russia is a significant escalation. Lammy described the situation as “dangerous,” noting that these missiles give Russia the ability to penetrate deeper into Ukrainian territory, threatening civilian and military targets alike.

The UK and US Response

The UK has already provided Ukraine with a range of military support, including Storm Shadow missiles with a range of approximately 250 kilometers (155 miles). However, these missiles have been used only against Russian forces in occupied Ukrainian territory, with restrictions on targeting sites inside Russia. Ukrainian officials have argued that without the ability to strike air bases and other strategic locations in Russia, they remain vulnerable to devastating attacks, including the use of Russian glide bombs, which are launched from well within Russian borders.

During their visit, both Lammy and Blinken announced additional aid packages for Ukraine. The UK pledged £600 million (about $780 million) in aid, focusing on humanitarian, energy, and stabilization needs. Meanwhile, the US promised $700 million in new assistance, including funding for the energy sector and efforts to clear landmines in war-affected areas.

The Ongoing Sanctions Campaign Against Iran

In response to Iran’s missile supply to Russia, the US, UK, France, and Germany have imposed new sanctions on Iran, targeting its missile programs and key industries. The UK government also summoned Iran’s top diplomat in London to formally address the accusations.

Despite the diplomatic pushback, the delivery of Iranian missiles to Russia seems likely to bolster Moscow’s military capabilities in the short term. Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal expressed gratitude for the continued support of Western allies but made it clear that Ukraine still needs access to long-range missiles capable of targeting Russian air bases and other crucial sites.

“We hope that long-range equipment for strikes on the territory of our enemy will be reached, and we will have it,” said Shmyhal. His statement reflects the growing frustration within Ukraine’s leadership over the limitations imposed on Western-supplied military equipment.

The Risk of Escalation

The potential use of long-range missiles against targets inside Russia remains a highly contentious issue among Ukraine’s allies. Both the US and the UK have imposed restrictions on Ukraine’s use of long-range weapons for fear that such strikes could provoke an escalatory response from Russia, including the use of nuclear weapons. However, the recent missile deliveries from Iran have forced Western leaders to reassess these concerns.

Earlier this year, the US government eased some restrictions, allowing Ukraine to target areas along Russia’s border where troops were firing on Ukrainian positions. However, strikes deeper inside Russia remain off-limits. Kyiv’s other Western allies have similarly provided long-range weapons with restrictions on their use inside Russian territory.

The Kremlin has already warned that it would respond “appropriately” if the US or other Western nations allowed Ukraine to use long-range missiles on Russian soil. Russia’s response to any Ukrainian strikes on its territory could significantly escalate the conflict, further complicating the already fragile international relations surrounding the war.

Conclusion: A Complex and Evolving Conflict

The delivery of Iranian ballistic missiles to Russia has undeniably shifted the dynamics of the war in Ukraine. As Russia continues to bolster its military arsenal, Ukraine faces increased pressure to defend its territory and secure additional military aid from its allies.

The ongoing debate over whether Ukraine should be allowed to use Western-supplied long-range missiles against Russian targets highlights the delicate balance that world leaders must maintain—supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty while avoiding a broader escalation of the conflict.

Both the UK and US have remained cautious in lifting restrictions on the use of long-range missiles, but Iran’s involvement may push the debate forward. As Ukrainian leaders like Zelensky and Shmyhal continue to advocate for increased military support, it remains to be seen how far Western nations are willing to go in providing the weapons Ukraine needs to defend itself.

For now, the conflict continues, with no clear end in sight. The involvement of external players like Iran only serves to complicate an already volatile situation, raising questions about the future trajectory of the war and the international response.

Pakistan PM Announces Education Emergency on International Literacy Day

On International Literacy Day, Pakistan made a momentous decision to address one of its most pressing issues—illiteracy. The country faces the staggering reality of 26 million children who are out of school, and the government, led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, has declared an education emergency to tackle this challenge head-on. This announcement is part of a larger effort to not only increase literacy but also to create a future where education is accessible to every child, regardless of their socioeconomic status.

Prime Minister’s Commitment to Education Reform

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s declaration of an education emergency marks a crucial turning point in Pakistan’s education policy. On this International Literacy Day, the 72-year-old leader of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) reaffirmed his government’s commitment to advancing the education agenda. Speaking at a public event, he called on both the private sector and civil society organizations to collaborate with the government to ensure the success of this campaign.

“We have declared an educational emergency across the country, launched an enrolment campaign for students, and initiated midday meals for children in schools,” said Prime Minister Sharif. His words echo a sense of urgency, as Pakistan grapples with the large number of out-of-school children, many of whom come from marginalized and underprivileged communities.

Education as a Fundamental Right

Prime Minister Sharif emphasized that literacy is more than just the ability to read and write. It is a fundamental human and constitutional right that guarantees the future of the country. “Literacy is not merely about reading and writing, but rather a gateway to empowerment, economic opportunities, and active participation in society,” he stated.

The prime minister’s vision for education goes beyond basic literacy; it encompasses a more holistic approach to education that aims to equip children with the skills needed to thrive in a rapidly evolving global economy. Education is seen as a tool for empowerment, providing individuals with the knowledge and skills they need to improve their lives, contribute to society, and drive the nation forward.

Reducing Dropout Rates and Encouraging Completion

One of the key challenges in Pakistan’s education sector is the high dropout rate among school-aged children. Many children, particularly those in rural areas, leave school before completing their education due to various socioeconomic factors, including poverty and lack of access to quality education.

To address this, Prime Minister Sharif’s government has introduced a range of initiatives aimed at reducing dropout rates and encouraging every child to complete their education. Scholarships and other financial incentives have been implemented to make education more accessible, particularly for families who may struggle to afford school fees, uniforms, and other educational materials.

By offering these incentives, the government hopes to create a more inclusive education system where every child, regardless of their background, has the opportunity to succeed.

Integrating Technology into Education

In today’s fast-paced, technology-driven world, literacy is no longer confined to reading and writing; it also involves digital literacy and technological skills. The prime minister recognized this shift and emphasized the importance of aligning education with the demands of the digital economy.

“In this rapidly emerging world, developing literacy and skills in line with technology is inevitable,” he said. The government is implementing a comprehensive plan to integrate technology into the educational system, ensuring that students are equipped with the necessary digital skills to thrive in the modern workforce.

This initiative aims to bridge the gap between traditional education and the needs of a digital economy. By incorporating technology into the curriculum, the government hopes to create a generation of digitally literate individuals who are capable of navigating the challenges of the 21st century.

Partnerships with the Private Sector and Civil Society

Prime Minister Sharif made it clear that the government cannot tackle the education crisis alone. He called on the private sector and civil society organizations to join forces with the government to create a more robust and inclusive education system.

“By establishing effective partnerships, we can link education with employment and self-employment opportunities, creating a stronger and more inclusive workforce,” he said. The prime minister’s call for collaboration reflects the understanding that education is a shared responsibility and that progress can only be achieved through collective effort.

Private sector involvement is seen as crucial in providing the financial resources, infrastructure, and expertise needed to support educational initiatives. Similarly, civil society organizations play a vital role in advocating for the rights of children and ensuring that marginalized communities are not left behind in the push for universal education.

The Scale of the Challenge

Earlier this year, in May, Prime Minister Sharif had already declared an education emergency, underscoring his government’s dedication to addressing the issue of out-of-school children. During the National Conference on Education Emergency, he laid out his plan to enroll 26 million out-of-school children and improve the country’s education system.

“Today, with iron conviction, and the support of provinces, we will handle the challenge of 26 million out-of-school children. We will bring them back to school,” he stated. Sharif’s determination to tackle this problem is evident in his focus on both enrollment and retention. He acknowledged that bringing children back to school requires not just access but also sustained financial resources and comprehensive policies to ensure success.

The Financial Burden of Education Reform

Prime Minister Sharif also highlighted the financial challenges involved in implementing these reforms. Education, particularly on the scale required in Pakistan, demands significant investment in infrastructure, teacher training, and educational materials. The government will need to allocate substantial financial resources to ensure that every child has access to quality education.

In addition to enrolling 26 million children, the prime minister also pointed out the issue of stunted growth, which affects a significant portion of Pakistan’s population. Malnutrition and poverty contribute to stunted growth, which in turn affects children’s ability to learn and succeed in school. Addressing both the educational and health needs of children will require a multi-pronged approach and long-term commitment.

International Literacy Day: A Global Perspective

The prime minister’s declaration of an education emergency comes on the occasion of International Literacy Day, observed annually on September 8. This day serves as a reminder to policymakers, practitioners, and the general public of the critical importance of literacy in creating a more just, peaceful, and sustainable society.

According to UNESCO, access to education remains a significant barrier in many parts of the world. The organization has reported that three out of four children in developing countries cannot read or comprehend a basic text by the age of 10. Globally, there are still 754 million illiterate adults, two-thirds of whom are women.

Pakistan’s education emergency is not just a national issue but part of a larger global challenge to improve literacy rates and ensure that every child has the opportunity to receive a quality education.

Conclusion: A Bold Step Toward a Literate Future

The education emergency declared by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on International Literacy Day represents a bold step toward eradicating illiteracy and ensuring that every child in Pakistan has access to education. The government’s commitment to this cause, along with the support of the private sector and civil society, is crucial to achieving these ambitious goals.

By focusing on both enrollment and retention, integrating technology into education, and offering financial incentives, the government is taking a comprehensive approach to education reform. While the road ahead may be challenging, Pakistan’s determination to tackle its literacy crisis is a promising sign of progress for the country’s future.

Schools Shut Down Following Bomb Threats Sparked by Trump’s False Claims About Haitians

A small community in Ohio has been shaken for a second consecutive day as bomb threats led to the evacuation of schools and government buildings. This latest wave of threats comes in the wake of unfounded rumors, propagated by former President Donald Trump, concerning Haitian immigrants. These false claims have added an unnecessary strain to an already tense situation, as authorities scramble to maintain safety and order in the community.

Bomb Threats Strike Springfield, Ohio

The city of Springfield, Ohio, located about 45 miles from the state capital of Columbus, found itself the center of unwanted national attention. On Friday, the second day of bomb threats targeting the city and its public institutions caused widespread evacuations. An email sent to local authorities claimed that bombs had been placed in the homes of the mayor and other city officials, sending the town into high alert.

According to Karen Graves, a spokesperson for the city of Springfield, the email also mentioned that bombs had been planted at several key locations across the city, including Springfield City Hall, multiple schools, and local government offices. The threats necessitated the immediate evacuation of these buildings and prompted a swift response from law enforcement.

“We are committed to the safety and well-being of our community and take all threats to public safety with the utmost seriousness,” said Graves in a public statement. She emphasized that local authorities are working closely with the Dayton office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to determine the origin of these email threats and to bring those responsible to justice.

Schools Take Drastic Measures

In response to the threats, the Springfield City School District acted swiftly, evacuating several schools to ensure the safety of students and staff. The district has been clear in its communication with parents, expressing both gratitude for their patience and determination to treat the situation with the seriousness it deserves.

“The safety of our Wildcat Family is our top priority,” the district said in a statement, noting that all threats would be fully investigated and prosecuted to the highest extent of the law. While no bombs were found following thorough searches of the buildings, the disruption and fear caused by the threats have had a profound impact on the community.

FBI Investigation Underway

Federal authorities, including the FBI, have joined local law enforcement in investigating the source of the bomb threats. The FBI’s involvement signifies the severity of the situation, and their expertise will be crucial in tracing the origin of the emails and identifying the perpetrators. As part of the investigation, authorities are looking into whether these threats are linked to the broader climate of fear and misinformation that has recently engulfed the city.

While the immediate threat appears to have been neutralized, as no bombs were found, the lingering anxiety and unrest remain palpable in Springfield. Local officials have urged the public to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activity, while reassuring them that every possible effort is being made to maintain public safety.

The Role of Misinformation in the Crisis

The recent bomb threats came just days after former President Donald Trump repeated unfounded rumors about Haitian immigrants during a televised presidential candidate debate. Trump’s claims—echoed by his running mate, Ohio Senator JD Vance, and other Republican figures—suggested that Haitian immigrants were responsible for abducting and eating pets in Springfield.

These rumors have been debunked numerous times, yet they continue to persist, fueled by political rhetoric. The baseless claims have led to an increase in tension within the predominantly white, blue-collar community, which has seen a recent influx of Haitian immigrants. The spread of such false information has created a toxic atmosphere that has complicated the efforts of local authorities to maintain peace and order.

At the debate, Trump’s statements further inflamed the situation, stoking fears and playing into existing prejudices. By amplifying these rumors on a national stage, he has brought unwanted attention to Springfield, making it a focal point in the national immigration debate. His remarks have not only deepened divisions within the community but have also potentially emboldened those responsible for making the bomb threats.

The Community’s Response

Despite the fear and disruption caused by the bomb threats, Springfield residents are trying to remain resilient. Schools and local government offices are gradually returning to normal operations, though the shadow of these threats still lingers.

Community leaders have called for unity and calm, urging residents not to be swayed by false information or divisive rhetoric. Local officials have also emphasized that the influx of immigrants, including Haitians, is not responsible for the crime or disorder in the city, and they have strongly condemned the spread of baseless rumors.

In the meantime, Springfield’s city administration, along with law enforcement agencies, continues to take all necessary precautions to ensure the safety of its residents. Extra patrols have been deployed, and local government offices are maintaining heightened security protocols in the wake of the bomb threats.

The Broader Implications of Political Misinformation

The situation in Springfield serves as a reminder of the power and consequences of political misinformation. When false claims are spread by prominent political figures, they can quickly take on a life of their own, influencing public perception and creating real-world dangers. In this case, the amplification of unfounded rumors has led to actual threats of violence, putting lives at risk and disrupting an entire community.

As the investigation continues, it remains to be seen whether the bomb threats were directly inspired by the rhetoric surrounding Haitian immigrants. What is clear, however, is that the city of Springfield has become an unfortunate example of how misinformation can spiral out of control, with devastating consequences.

Conclusion: A Community in Need of Healing

As Springfield faces the aftermath of these threats, the community must come together to heal and move forward. The bomb threats have shaken the town, but they have also highlighted the importance of unity and clear communication in times of crisis. Local officials have been working tirelessly to protect residents and maintain order, but the impact of false rumors has created additional challenges.

The spread of misinformation, especially when amplified by national political figures, can have serious consequences. As Springfield navigates this difficult period, the hope is that the city can overcome the fear and division sown by these rumors, and emerge stronger and more united in the face of adversity. The role of responsible leadership and informed public discourse has never been more critical, as Springfield’s experience demonstrates the dangers of allowing falsehoods to fester in a community.

Media Development Programme Empowers Lima’s Next Generation of Reporters

World Athletics’ Media Development Programme Shapes Future Reporters

Introduction: Championing Journalism in Athletics

World Athletics has highlighted the crucial role journalists play in sports coverage. At the World Athletics U20 Championships Lima 24, twelve emerging reporters embarked on the Media Development Programme (MDP). This initiative, in partnership with the International Sports Press Association (AIPS), aimed to cultivate young journalists with a focus on athletics.

Transformative Training for Young Reporters

The MDP provided an enriching blend of theoretical and practical training. Over the course of the programme, reporters from Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela gathered at the Estadio Atlético la Videna, the site of the World U20 Championships. The sessions included presentations, discussions, and hands-on experiences, all while offering a privileged view of the track.

Mentorship and Expertise

Veteran journalist Martin Mazur, known for his extensive work with publications such as El Gráfico and FourFourTwo, led the programme. As the director of the AIPS Sport Media Awards, Mazur brought invaluable experience to the training.

Alondra Naupari, a reporter from Peru, reflected on her learning: “Focusing on details, capturing a good story, and honing observation skills were key takeaways from Martin’s sessions.” The programme simulated a real newsroom environment, covering everything from story pitching to the significance of accuracy and reputation in journalism.

Mazur emphasized the programme’s modular approach: “Some journalists were more experienced or specialized in specific areas. We started from scratch, which helped them grow both individually and as a group.”

In-Depth Knowledge of Athletics

Understanding the rules of athletics was crucial for effective reporting. Luca Verrascina, Senior Competition Manager at World Athletics, provided insights during a tour of the athletics track. Manuela Santos from Ecuador praised the interactive nature of the experience, which clarified complex aspects of the sport.

Behind the Scenes of Major Events

The young reporters learned about the logistics of organizing major athletics events, such as the Diamond League and World Championships, from Zacharias Vailakis, Head of Media Operations at World Athletics. Lucas Nazrala from Bolivia noted the immense scale of these events and the multifaceted nature of athletics.

Mastering Flash Quotes and Interviews

A significant portion of the programme was dedicated to preparing for flash quotes, a vital aspect of sports reporting. Press Delegate Antonio Carvalho guided the participants on how to gather key information and conduct effective interviews. Vanessa Galvan from Venezuela appreciated the focus on respecting athletes and understanding their preferences during interviews.

The Role of Digital and Social Media

Laura Arcoleo, Social Media Manager at World Athletics, highlighted the impact of digital platforms on sports communication. Itzel Luna from Panama found the session particularly enlightening, noting how social media influences athlete growth and federation evolution. Michelle Sammet and Jessica Whittington from the World Athletics Communications team also provided insights into the importance of digital communication and resource optimization.

Emotional Insights and Broadcasting

The programme also included discussions on the emotional aspects of sports journalism, such as meeting members of the Athlete Refugee Team. Vanessa Galvan and Rodrigo D’Angelo shared their reflections on how sports offer hope to individuals facing extreme challenges.

Broadcasting was another key topic, with Joris Wauman explaining the technical aspects behind televising events. Rodrigo D’Angelo from Argentina was impressed by the complexity of broadcasting operations.

Celebrating Achievements

The programme culminated in a ceremony where participants received certificates from Helio Marinho Gesta de Melo, president of Atletismo Sudamericano. The intensive training, which ran from 9 am to 9 pm daily, marked a significant milestone in their journalism careers. Sebastian Lasquera from Argentina expressed gratitude for the opportunity, emphasizing the growth of athletics in South America.

Looking Ahead

Martin Mazur concluded the programme with a reflection on the journey: “We focused on the eagerness to tell stories rather than prior knowledge of athletics. By the end of the programme, participants gained not only enhanced knowledge but also stronger storytelling skills.”

The experience ended with a group photo on the track, symbolizing the hard work and dedication of the young reporters.

AIPS’s Commitment to Future Journalists

AIPS President Gianni Merlo praised the Media Development Programme: “Since 2011, our Young Reporters Programme has aimed to nurture the next generation of journalists. Our collaboration with World Athletics exemplifies the power of AIPS and its network, providing a unique learning experience for emerging journalists passionate about athletics.”

Biden to Host Final Quad Summit of His Term in Wilmington Hometown

Biden to Host Final Quad Summit of His Term in Wilmington

A Summit of Strategic Importance

US President Joe Biden is set to host the final Quad summit of his term in his hometown of Wilmington, Delaware, on September 21. This meeting will bring together the leaders of Australia, India, and Japan, underscoring Biden’s commitment to bolstering US alliances as part of his Indo-Pacific strategy.

This summit will be Biden’s fourth in-person gathering with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida. It highlights the ongoing significance of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) in addressing China’s expanding influence in the region.

Venue Change and Diplomatic Significance

Originally planned for India, the summit was relocated to the US to align with the United Nations General Assembly in New York City. Biden’s choice to hold the event in Wilmington, rather than the more conventional location of New York, reflects his personal approach to diplomacy and underscores his dedication to reinforcing US alliances.

Key Themes of the Summit

The Biden administration has consistently highlighted the Quad’s importance since 2021, viewing it as a crucial platform for managing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific. The summit is expected to focus on enhancing cooperation in health, disaster relief, and maritime security—key areas where the Quad has made notable progress.

A senior administration official remarked, “The Quad illustrates the region’s commitment to collective action, fostering peace and stability despite challenges posed by China.” Key outcomes are anticipated to include initiatives in global health, humanitarian collaboration, and strengthening the Indo-Pacific Partnership for Maritime Domain Awareness to counteract China’s activities in contested maritime zones.

Future Prospects for the Quad

The summit, occurring just weeks before the US presidential election, aims to secure the Quad’s future beyond the current administration. Efforts will focus on ensuring the alliance remains a bipartisan priority, with long-term funding and legislative support in mind.

Despite Biden’s imminent departure from office, the Quad is expected to persist as a significant geopolitical force. The official noted, “While the Quad is a cornerstone of President Biden’s Indo-Pacific legacy, it is evolving into an enduring institution shaping the region’s geopolitical landscape.”

This summit will also serve as a farewell for Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, who is stepping down. His successor is anticipated to continue Japan’s strong commitment to the Quad.

Biden’s Legacy and Diplomatic Engagements

Biden’s engagement with the Quad reflects his longstanding belief in cultivating strong international relationships. As he approaches the end of his term, Biden plans to maintain his diplomatic efforts, with upcoming travel to the G20 Summit in Brazil and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting in Peru. Additional potential visits to Germany and Africa are also on the agenda, alongside ongoing dialogues with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Historical Context and Global Significance

Hosting the Quad summit in Wilmington will be a first for Biden since taking office and follows his previous hosting of international leaders at Camp David. This personal venue choice mirrors past US presidential practices, such as George W. Bush’s meetings with Vladimir Putin at his Texas ranch and Barack Obama’s NATO summit in Chicago.

The Quad’s Role in the Indo-Pacific

Established after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami to coordinate disaster relief, the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) was revived in 2017 amid growing concerns about China’s influence. Although China has labeled the Quad as an ‘Asian NATO,’ the group focuses on deepening economic, diplomatic, and military cooperation rather than a formal mutual defense pact. The Quad’s vision for a “free, open, and inclusive Indo-Pacific” directly challenges China’s regional ambitions.

Anticipations for the Summit

The September 21 summit will aim to strengthen existing partnerships and deliver concrete outcomes across various sectors, particularly health and security. As the US approaches a critical election, global leaders will be watching to see if Biden’s alliance-building efforts will persist under the next administration, whether led by Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump.

As Biden’s tenure nears its end and Kishida steps down, this Quad summit could be a pivotal moment for both the Indo-Pacific region and the broader global order.

Former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori Passes Away at 86

Alberto Fujimori, Former President of Peru, Dies at 86

A Controversial Legacy

Alberto Fujimori, who served as Peru’s president from 1990 to 2000, has passed away at the age of 86. Fujimori, known for his controversial tenure, died at his residence after a prolonged battle with cancer, as confirmed by his daughter, Keiko Fujimori.

The Rise and Fall of Fujimori

Fujimori, the son of Japanese immigrants, first took office amid a severe left-wing guerrilla insurgency. His administration was praised for its success in defeating the Shining Path rebel group, a move that earned him significant acclaim. However, this victory came at a high human cost, with reports of severe abuses including the killing of 25 individuals by government-backed death squads.

Despite his tough stance against insurgents, Fujimori’s presidency was marred by allegations of corruption. In 2000, he was forced to resign under the shadow of numerous corruption scandals.

Public Reaction and Mourning

Following his death, Peruvians gathered outside Fujimori’s residence to mourn, with some supporters declaring him a national hero. His children, including Keiko Fujimori, released a statement confirming his passing and noting that he had been battling tongue cancer.

A Divisive Figure

Fujimori’s presidency was marked by both economic reform and authoritarian measures. His radical austerity policies, known as “Fujishock,” stabilized Peru’s economy and curbed inflation. However, his decision to close Congress in 1992 and his handling of human rights issues cast a long shadow over his administration.

A significant episode during his presidency was the 1996/97 hostage crisis, where his decisive actions against Marxist rebels were widely praised. Despite these moments of strong leadership, his later years were tainted by corruption charges, leading to his flight from Peru and subsequent arrest in Chile.

Legacy and Family

In December 2023, Fujimori was released from prison following a reinstated presidential pardon. His daughter Keiko Fujimori, a prominent political figure and leader of the conservative People’s Force party, has been one of his most ardent defenders. She had also indicated plans for her father’s return to politics, surprising many given his age.

Following his death, the Peruvian government has declared three days of national mourning. Fujimori’s supporters will have the opportunity to pay their respects at the National Museum in Lima before his burial.

Conclusion

Alberto Fujimori’s death marks the end of a complex and controversial chapter in Peru’s history. His legacy remains a subject of debate, reflecting a presidency defined by both significant achievements and grave controversies.

Raygun Rises to World No. 1: Technicality Secures Top Spot

Rachael Gunn: Breakdancing’s Controversial World No. 1 Amid Olympic Dispute

A Divisive Olympic Performance

Rachael Gunn, performing under the moniker Raygun, remains the world’s top female breakdancer despite a contentious Olympic performance that garnered a score of zero and sparked widespread debate. Her routine, featuring unconventional moves like the sprinkler and the kangaroo hop, failed to impress judges, leaving the breakdancing community and fans divided.

WDSF Addresses Ranking Concerns

In response to growing scrutiny, the World DanceSport Federation (WDSF) has issued a statement clarifying its ranking methodology. The WDSF explained that rankings are based on athletes’ top four performances over the past year, excluding Olympic events and qualifiers. This approach was intended to focus athletes solely on the Games, leading to a unique set of circumstances where some rankings were determined by a single event.

Raygun’s Continued Defense

Despite the controversy, Gunn has defended her position as Australia’s leading B-girl. The 37-year-old university lecturer emphasizes that her ranking is a result of her victory at the Oceania continental championships in October 2023, which earned her 1,000 points. Gunn maintains that her Olympic performance does not overshadow her consistent track record in other competitions.

WDSF’s Transparency and Credibility

The WDSF’s statement aimed to address concerns about the transparency and credibility of its rankings. The federation acknowledged that the period between late 2023 and the Olympics, during which no ranking events were held, created anomalies in the rankings. They stressed that current rankings should be viewed alongside recent global breaking competitions for a more accurate representation.

Community Reactions and Future of Breakdancing in the Olympics

The debate over Gunn’s performance has polarized the breakdancing community. Some supporters stand by the athlete, while others criticize her for allegedly undermining the sport. This controversy has also fueled discussions about the suitability of breakdancing, which debuted at the Paris Olympics but is not slated for the 2028 Los Angeles Games, as an Olympic discipline.

Zack Slusser, vice-president of Breaking for Gold USA, criticized the WDSF’s handling of rankings and events. He argued that the federation’s lack of merit and failure to organize accurate ranking events has led to a situation where athletes participate merely to qualify for the Olympics, with little incentive to continue in the post-Olympic era.

The ongoing saga highlights the complexities and challenges of integrating breakdancing into the Olympic framework, raising questions about its future as an Olympic sport.

Donald Trump’s Journey: From Real Estate Mogul to Political Powerhouse

Donald Trump: From Real Estate Mogul to Political Comeback

Early Life and Inheritance

Donald Trump, now 78, began his journey far from the political spotlight. Born into a wealthy New York real estate family, he was the fourth child of Fred Trump, a prominent real estate developer. Initially expected to take on minor roles within the family business, Donald’s path diverged significantly.

At 13, Trump was sent to a military academy due to behavioral issues. After graduating from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, he took control of his father’s company in 1971, renaming it The Trump Organization. Under his leadership, the company shifted focus from residential properties in Brooklyn and Queens to high-profile Manhattan projects.

Building the Trump Brand

During the 1980s and 1990s, Trump expanded his business empire, including iconic properties like Trump Tower and the Grand Hyatt. His real estate ventures extended globally, with developments in Atlantic City, Chicago, Las Vegas, and beyond. Trump’s media presence soared with ownership of beauty pageants and as the creator and host of NBC’s “The Apprentice,” where his catchphrase “You’re fired!” became widely recognized.

Despite his success, Trump’s financial journey was marred by six business bankruptcies and failed ventures such as Trump Steaks and Trump University. Reports of significant tax avoidance and financial losses added to his controversial image.

Personal Life and Public Scrutiny

Trump’s personal life attracted considerable media attention. His first marriage to Ivana Zelnickova, a Czech model, ended in a highly publicized divorce in 1990. He then married Marla Maples in 1993, with whom he had a daughter, Tiffany. Their marriage also ended in divorce in 1999.

His current marriage to former Slovenian model Melania Knauss began in 2005, and they have one son, Barron. Trump’s personal controversies, including allegations of sexual misconduct and extramarital affairs, have frequently surfaced, adding to his complex public persona.

Political Ambitions and Presidency

Trump’s flirtation with politics began in the 1980s but did not gain serious traction until 2015. His campaign announcement in June 2015 was marked by controversial statements and promises, including a proposed border wall and sweeping changes to U.S. foreign policy. His unconventional campaign style resonated with many voters, leading to a surprising victory over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.

As the 45th President, Trump brought a high level of drama to the office, making policy decisions on social media and engaging in frequent confrontations with foreign leaders. His presidency was characterized by significant policy shifts, including withdrawing from international agreements, implementing strict immigration measures, and reshaping Middle Eastern relations.

Impeachments and Challenges

Trump’s presidency was marked by two impeachments. The first, in 2019, accused him of pressuring Ukraine to investigate his political rival, Joe Biden. He was acquitted by the Senate. The second impeachment, following the January 6 Capitol riot, resulted in another acquittal.

The COVID-19 pandemic dominated his final year in office, with his handling of the crisis facing severe criticism. Despite receiving a record 74 million votes in the 2020 election, Trump lost to Biden. His refusal to accept the election results led to a tumultuous end to his presidency, culminating in the January 6th riot and his second impeachment.

The Comeback Trail

Post-presidency, Trump remained a central figure in American politics, with significant influence over the Republican Party. Despite legal battles and a historically controversial tenure, he announced another presidential run for 2024. His campaign strategy has focused on attacking the current administration’s policies and leveraging his loyal supporter base.

As he seeks a return to the Oval Office, Trump’s political journey is poised for a dramatic new chapter, reflecting both his resilience and the ongoing divisions within American politics.

Bali Halts Construction to Combat Overtourism and Safeguard Environment

Bali Imposes Construction Freeze to Address Overtourism and Protect Environment

Moratorium on Development

In response to escalating concerns about overdevelopment and environmental degradation, Indonesia is set to impose a comprehensive construction freeze in Bali, one of the world’s top tourist destinations. Coordinating Maritime Affairs and Investment Minister Luhut Pandjaitan announced this decisive measure on Sunday, which targets the halt of new hotels, nightclubs, and villas. The moratorium, potentially lasting up to a decade, aims to preserve Bali’s agricultural lands and mitigate the impacts of unchecked tourism growth.

Luhut emphasized the flexible nature of the freeze, stating, “We’ll see later [how long the moratorium is in effect]. It could be five years, it could be 10 years. It just depends on the evaluation.”

Response to Overdevelopment

The initiative comes following a formal request from Bali’s acting governor, Sang Made Mahendra Jaya, who highlighted the urgent need to address overdevelopment in the island’s key tourist areas: Denpasar, Badung, Gianyar, and Tabanan. These regions, central to Bali’s tourism boom, have been under increasing strain from both environmental and infrastructural pressures.

Since reopening to international visitors post-pandemic, Bali has seen a dramatic rise in tourist arrivals, with 3.89 million visitors from January to July this year, up from 2.9 million during the same period last year. This influx has intensified the burden on the island’s infrastructure, which supports 4.4 million permanent residents.

Impact of Tourism Surge

The sharp increase in tourism has not only stressed local resources but has also sparked social media outrage over visitor behavior. Instances of visa overstays and disrespect for sacred sites have led to the deportation of 340 foreign nationals last year.

Minister of Tourism and Creative Economy Sandiaga Uno confirmed that the government is drafting a policy to address these challenges. “The government is working on a comprehensive strategy to prevent unsafe and uncomfortable conditions arising from excessive construction,” Uno stated. The focus will be on promoting high-quality tourism that supports local communities and job creation.

Environmental Concerns

Environmental groups have long voiced concerns about Bali’s rapid development, which threatens the island’s agricultural heritage and natural ecosystem. Made Krisna Dinata, executive director of Walhi Bali, criticized the delayed response to overdevelopment, arguing that action should have been taken years ago. “Bali is overbuilt. Tourism has caused significant damage, with green spaces replaced by concrete,” Dinata noted, highlighting that the number of hotels on the island has surged from 249 a decade ago to 541 today.

The transformation of rice fields into commercial properties raises additional concerns about food security. Interim governor Mahendra Jaya emphasized the need to protect agricultural lands, noting that high water consumption by hotels exacerbates local resource strain. Environmental experts are advocating for stricter regulations to manage land use and protect Bali’s delicate ecosystem. However, some, like Associate Professor Agung Wardana, remain skeptical about the moratorium’s effectiveness, pointing to potential challenges in enforcing the policy.

Global Trends in Managing Overtourism

Bali’s new policy aligns with a broader trend among popular destinations grappling with overtourism. Similar measures have been implemented in Kyoto’s Geisha district in Japan, where streets are closed to manage tourist behavior, and in Venice, Italy, where a daytrip fee has been introduced to control visitor numbers.

Given Bali’s heavy reliance on tourism for economic growth, the government faces the difficult task of balancing economic benefits with the need to preserve local culture and resources. With 200,000 foreign residents on the island, Luhut reaffirmed the government’s commitment to sustainable tourism practices. “Without preserving our culture, tourism will not thrive. This needs to be managed properly,” he concluded.